Hi, T-Diamond - It is myself who owes you the apology for directing such a self-centered and largely out of left field reply to you comments, which as you say, were merely trying to give an answer to my question and express a single concise opinion of your own.

If you are interested in discussing the role of media with me, I'd be happy to further engage. I tend to break down information semantically in order to filter out the background noise of well formed sentences.

Your statements have a context.

I would say they all refer to the domain of show-biz.

Every domain has discrete entities, Show-biz has, among others:

- MEDIA
- CELEBRITIES
- CONSUMERS

The domain of show biz is filled with instances of its various entities.

Of the entities referred to here, all instances map to individual people.

MEDIA --> a member of the press

PERFORMER --> an actor who is employed to participate in the production of a product (episode, movie, newscast,etc..)

CONSUMER --> individuals of the television watching population. Any discussion in the domain of show-biz (in my opinion) must consider this entity because without anyone to watch a thing, there is no reason for any of the other entities to exist.

so:

(I) MEDIA >>puts emphasis on>> CELEBRITIES : Sexual Preference

I have observed that the MEDIA, as a whole, is a domain in it's own right. In addition, they also owe their existence to CONSUMERS.

Following the principal that the simplest explanation tends to be correct, then by (I) I would tend to infer:

(I.a) CONSUMERS <<demand details unrelated to raw talent<< PERFORMERS

(I.b) MEDIA >>works to supply the demand in (I.a)>> CONSUMERS

From the above, I conclude that the value of a performer in the eyes of a consumer is simply not based on raw talent.

Is this WRONG? Or just a fact to be noted?

0  out of 2 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?    

me too......i don't know what it is, but it IS!!!! He turns me on which leads to better *** with my hubby!!!

1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you find this valuable? Do you?